On 31 May 2019, the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) released a draft of the National Education Policy (NEP). This is the ﬁrst update to India’s education coverage in almost 30 years, and there has been lots of debate on the recommendations, and it became open to the general public for comments and pointers till July 31.
Central Square Foundation’s (CSF) monthly newsletter The EDge requested eminent names from the education zone to share their mind on a few key elements of the policy.
1. Ashish Dhawan, Founder, and Chairman, Central Square Foundation
What is your initial reaction to the draft NEP? If carried out, how do you see the effect of the coverage on our schooling machine?
The draft NEP changed into a long time coming, but it has made a few bold and welcome guidelines to shift the focus of the training device closer to great, and enhancing pupil studying outcomes. It takes a protracted-time period of view in terms of the emphasis on flexibility and abilties to make sure that our children are equipped for a hastily changing job situation.
When I study it, my immediate thought became that we have a coverage document, although it’s a draft, that explicitly recognizes that we’re currently in an intense gaining knowledge of the crisis and that this disaster starts in the early years. This is significant. If we had been to focus and get this one component right, i.E., make sure all kids have foundational literacy and numeracy competencies, this in itself could have an extremely good effect at the training gadget.
What are a number of the important thing steps the authorities can take for the successful implementation of the coverage? How can the coverage translate into actual action?
The venture is that current country capability to deliver satisfactory schooling is weak, and we do no longer have the resources to consciousness on so many things at the equal time. My one recommendation to the government could be that they ought to almost ruthlessly prioritise–they need to first cognizance on ensuring that all kids achieve foundational literacy and numeracy, after which phase in other priorities, as wanted.
Separately, I assume it’s essential to remember the fact that implementation rests with states. The center’s role is primarily one of catalyzing demand for critical reforms with the states, putting broader coverage dreams, imparting funding to states, and so forth. The center can not be too prescriptive in terms of ‘how’ states want to put into effect. In reality, it desires to present states the autonomy to select the maximum cost-powerful pathways, whilst preserving duty for the proper results. The center needs to additionally consider enabling states to increase 3-five 12 months plans, and no longer annual plans.
What, in keeping with you, are the big misses of the draft NEP, if any?
One of the important thing concerns with the draft training policy is that like many different guidelines, it is able to be trying to do too much. As a device, we first want to recognition on getting the basics proper–make certain that every one our kids acquire foundational literacy and numeracy by elegance 3. Without this prioritization, the gadget will hold to grapple with more than one competing priorities.
We cannot wish to acquire foundational mastering for all our youngsters if we don’t measure it correctly. Therefore, one of the largest areas of reform in this regard, which isn’t always effectively addressed by means of the policy in its modern form, is the want to ensure impartial and reliable gaining knowledge of records to measure early grade learning consequences.